Monthly Archives: July 2012

Gun Control stuffed into cyber security bill?

by

http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-contro…
Really – don’t go back to sleep, Just when you think we’ve made our wishes known and expressed with the shelving of the unpopular Arms Trade Treaty in the UN – now they want to add it to the internet control bill. Oh it’s fun living in the free world…

 

RELATED

by

GUN CONTROL ALERT – Attached to Bill S. 3414 Cyber Security Bill. Amendment .SA 2575

Make sure you contact your representitives ASAP!

http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-contro…

S.3414, the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 SA 2575

SEC. ll. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES. (a) DEFINITION.—Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following: ”(30) The term ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’— ”(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but ”(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.”. (b) PROHIBITIONS.—Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following: ”(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

”(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

”(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device. ”(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to—

”(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

”(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off- site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

”(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or

”(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.”.

(c) PENALTIES.—Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.”.

(d) IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS.—Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ”A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.”.

 

30 days in the slammer for catching rain water

A man in Jackson County Oregon has been sentenced to 30 days in jail for catching rain water on his property. Of coarse if it was truly his property he would not be in jail. So if it rains on your property, not a problem, but if you divert or collect the rain for your garden the UN Agenda 21 complicit local officials will throw you in the slammer for 30 days in Oregon.

Whats even more ridiculous is the sustainable UN Agenda 21 commie Bolsheviks in many States (and also Provinces in Canada) actually subsidized rain collection barrels with your tax money.  Then the same sustainable UN Agenda 21 Bolshevik traitors go after the very people they indoctrinated years before. Corporatism at its best.

There is no doubt, this is United Nations Agenda 21 in action, which is pretty much high treason in any country.

Related
Montreal Couple Threatened by Gov. For Growing Front Yard Garden
Alabama adopts state ban on UN Agenda 21
CLNN – Invasive species and sustainability
City Planning and the UN
Agenda 21 Micro-Apartment Scheme Being Beta-Tested in NYC

Agenda 21 for Dummies

Batman Mr Rodgers and the UN

Batman, Mr Rodgers, and the United Nations  invade this episode of the unsolicited opinion on orion talk radio

related

Montreal Couple Threatened by Gov. For Growing Front Yard Garden

Reblogged from Canadian Truths:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

Ron Stephens

All municipal governments in Canada are guilty of pushing UN Agenda 21 on it's citizens. This is treason and a breach of trust. People vote in municipal elections expecting local representation. Unfortunately, your municipal government does not represent you. Your local government is at the dictate of upper-level government/corporations and do their bidding. Therefore, your local council does not and cannot represent you at the local level.

Read more… 460 more words

Mr Rodgers sustainable Commiehood?

I always thought Mr Rodgers was creepy but i didn’t know it went to this extent.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 561 other followers

%d bloggers like this: